Ljlego 21:54, 28 Farbleum 2008 (UTC) Random idea: For additional confusion, a "noob" could first be described as a good thing to be ("Non-objectionable", perhaps?), and then suddenly things go wrong and it is bad!. 00:51, 4 Arche 2008 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Wackypedia:Review/HowTo:Go on IRC
|
rdfs:comment
| - Ljlego 21:54, 28 Farbleum 2008 (UTC) Random idea: For additional confusion, a "noob" could first be described as a good thing to be ("Non-objectionable", perhaps?), and then suddenly things go wrong and it is bad!. 00:51, 4 Arche 2008 (UTC)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Mcomment
| - Overall, a little too un-strange, I think; weirding it up a bit would add that nonsense edge.
|
Icomment
| |
Ccomment
| - A questionable guide for a sensible subject; good.
|
Cscore
| |
Mscore
| |
Iscore
| |
Fcomment
| |
dbkwik:wackypedia/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
Signature
| - {{:User:The Divine Fluffalizer/_s
|
Lcomment
| - Good potential; if it were less sane, I'd vote for it for feature.
|
Ecomment
| - The confusion and questionableness is good, but the insulting parts are a bit too plain. Reducing harshness a bit, replacing it with nutty suggestions for self-improvement , or otherwise making them more nonsensical would serve to increase the "WTF?"-factor of the guide.
|
Escore
| |
Fscore
| |
abstract
| - Ljlego 21:54, 28 Farbleum 2008 (UTC) Random idea: For additional confusion, a "noob" could first be described as a good thing to be ("Non-objectionable", perhaps?), and then suddenly things go wrong and it is bad!. 00:51, 4 Arche 2008 (UTC)
|