About: Peer review/Megitza/archive1   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it up to the best standard possible. My last peer review on an article recently was archived. Thanks, ⇒TAP 21:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC) It was lucky to scrape GA. I can't see how it would ever pass FA. not enough resourceful reliable sources, You're picking the wrong sorts of articles to peer review and take to FAC. You're better off picking articles on subjects which are very notable with masses of sources,♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC) The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Peer review/Megitza/archive1
rdfs:comment
  • I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it up to the best standard possible. My last peer review on an article recently was archived. Thanks, ⇒TAP 21:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC) It was lucky to scrape GA. I can't see how it would ever pass FA. not enough resourceful reliable sources, You're picking the wrong sorts of articles to peer review and take to FAC. You're better off picking articles on subjects which are very notable with masses of sources,♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC) The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it up to the best standard possible. My last peer review on an article recently was archived. Thanks, ⇒TAP 21:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC) It was lucky to scrape GA. I can't see how it would ever pass FA. not enough resourceful reliable sources, You're picking the wrong sorts of articles to peer review and take to FAC. You're better off picking articles on subjects which are very notable with masses of sources,♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC) Happily I did not mention FA on this one. :) I just want to try and get my GAs to a higher standard than they currently are now. ⇒TAP 19:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC) * If you link "Polish", most articles I've seen would link that to Polish people. * "she began appearing in" why not just "she appeared in"? * "and promoting Polish" -> if you do the above, then "and where she promoted Polish..." * "She was introduced to the traditional music of Gorals by her father, and began singing, dancing, and playing the traditional bass instrument in a children folk dance ensemble in her village, Bańska Wyżna." unreferenced. * "but also experimenting with " experimented. * " the highest score (126) at the Polish National IQ contest in Chicago" really? Ouch, but perhaps expand IQ before using it as an abbreviation. * " She has been promoting the culture of..." is she still doing it? If so "She promotes..." if not "She promoted..." * "a self-taught vocalist and a bass player" so she just taught herself to be a vocalist and not a bassist? Or is she self-taught in both disciplines? * Odd format with the Singles table, a spare cell in the heading row. * Discography section is entirely unreferenced. * Spare row at the end of the Singles table. * Don't use so many categories, e.g. "Women in music" is far less refined (but in the same thread) as "Polish female singers". Check the others. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC) File:Yes check.svg Done all. Thank you! ⇒TAP 18:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC) You're welcome. I wish you all the best with the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software