About: Quest talk:Field Duty   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

See Quest:Gnome Engineering for another example of my changes. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC) It is correct that the TEXT of this quest differs between Alliance and Horde. This page does not supplant the relevant separate pages, it provides a common point of reference. AND a page that is useful upon first glance, instead of having to then go to the disambiguated page. If you feel quite strongly against the Questbox, then remove that - but leave this page in . The purpose and results of this quest are identical between the two varieties. Discussion and notes about either quest should have a united location.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Quest talk:Field Duty
rdfs:comment
  • See Quest:Gnome Engineering for another example of my changes. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC) It is correct that the TEXT of this quest differs between Alliance and Horde. This page does not supplant the relevant separate pages, it provides a common point of reference. AND a page that is useful upon first glance, instead of having to then go to the disambiguated page. If you feel quite strongly against the Questbox, then remove that - but leave this page in . The purpose and results of this quest are identical between the two varieties. Discussion and notes about either quest should have a united location.
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • See Quest:Gnome Engineering for another example of my changes. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2009 (UTC) It is correct that the TEXT of this quest differs between Alliance and Horde. This page does not supplant the relevant separate pages, it provides a common point of reference. AND a page that is useful upon first glance, instead of having to then go to the disambiguated page. If you feel quite strongly against the Questbox, then remove that - but leave this page in . The purpose and results of this quest are identical between the two varieties. Discussion and notes about either quest should have a united location. The only element unique enough to go on the individual pages are the stats of the monster. Yes, IMO. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC) It's not about the questbox, it's about the whole trying-to-make-it-a-quest-page deal - you condensed the information from both quests into something that just doesn't look good. Quest articles aren't for condensing information from other versions of the same quests but with different texts - it's been done before and it should not be done again. 00:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC) As may be shown by this particular edit war, I disagree wholeheartedly. The purpose for pages describing quests is to describe the quests. The one-to-one correspondence between 'blizzard data object' and 'wiki page' was maintained. Even the fact that Quest:Field Duty was a disambiguation page remained blazingly obvious. What remains are two possibilities: 1) What I added offended your sense of what a disambiguation page was. I can do nothing for you here. 2) You are offended by my writing. This can be changed compare favorably with your expectations. You would be the best guide for that. Simply saying "it should not be done again" is an opinion. Please flesh out your opinion with facts. --Eirik Ratcatcher (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software