About: Admin Tools Wiki:Edit filter/Requested   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Bear the following in mind: * Filters are applied to all edits. Therefore, problematic changes that apply to a single page are likely not suitable for an abuse filter. * Each filter takes time to run, making editing (and to some extent other things) slightly slower. The time is only a few milliseconds per filter, but with enough filters, that adds up. When the system is near its limit, adding a new filter may require removing an older filter in order to keep the system within its limits. * There is a limit to what filters can check for. More complex, non-essential tasks, such as those that need to perform a more in-depth check of the page or fetch information that the filter system does not have access to, are better served by separate software, run by an individual user on their

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Admin Tools Wiki:Edit filter/Requested
rdfs:comment
  • Bear the following in mind: * Filters are applied to all edits. Therefore, problematic changes that apply to a single page are likely not suitable for an abuse filter. * Each filter takes time to run, making editing (and to some extent other things) slightly slower. The time is only a few milliseconds per filter, but with enough filters, that adds up. When the system is near its limit, adding a new filter may require removing an older filter in order to keep the system within its limits. * There is a limit to what filters can check for. More complex, non-essential tasks, such as those that need to perform a more in-depth check of the page or fetch information that the filter system does not have access to, are better served by separate software, run by an individual user on their
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:admintools/...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Bear the following in mind: * Filters are applied to all edits. Therefore, problematic changes that apply to a single page are likely not suitable for an abuse filter. * Each filter takes time to run, making editing (and to some extent other things) slightly slower. The time is only a few milliseconds per filter, but with enough filters, that adds up. When the system is near its limit, adding a new filter may require removing an older filter in order to keep the system within its limits. * There is a limit to what filters can check for. More complex, non-essential tasks, such as those that need to perform a more in-depth check of the page or fetch information that the filter system does not have access to, are better served by separate software, run by an individual user on their own machine or dedicated server, rather than those used to actually host Admin Tools Wiki. * It used to be called the abuse filter for a reason. Contributors are not expected to have read all the myriad policies, guidelines, and style pages. Trivial formatting mistakes and edits that at first glance look fine but go against some obscure style guideline or arbitration ruling are not suitable candidates for an abuse filter — quite apart from performance concerns, if it doesn’t harm Admin Tools Wiki, it is best not to hassle new members because of it. * For preventing the creation of pages with certain names, MediaWiki:Titleblacklist is usually a better way to handle the problem — see MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist for details. Also, for preventing the creation of pages with certain names, “salting” may be used.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software