About: RuneScape:Featured articles/Nex/2   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I think this article is well written, has a good history section and good trivia. I think it is well written, and could already be featured on the main page, despite the age of the article. Support - As nom. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 09:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC) 05:33, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured articles/Nex/2
rdfs:comment
  • I think this article is well written, has a good history section and good trivia. I think it is well written, and could already be featured on the main page, despite the age of the article. Support - As nom. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 09:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC) 05:33, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I think this article is well written, has a good history section and good trivia. I think it is well written, and could already be featured on the main page, despite the age of the article. Support - As nom. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 09:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - Currently, although the article is comprehensive, the strategy section is missing. --Flajuram 11:49, January 17, 2011 (UTC) Neutral - The article is good, yes, but it is still missing some lore. This lore includes Sliske's role in reawakening Nex with the aid of Ashuelot Reis (the ghost banker in the Ancient Prison). You can find this out by speaking to Ashuelot in the Ancient Prison, or by going to this thread on the Runescape Forums: 16-17-920-62156003 "The Sliske/Nex Conspiracy".--Lord Drakan 00:16, January 18, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - As much as I love that epic pic *cough*, there is no strategy guide whatsoever (naming the attacks does not count as a strategy guide) and it's missing a lot of lore, like the above person said. If you speak to Ashuelot Reis you'll realize how much lore it's missing. I just don't think it's ready yet. (: 20:33, January 17, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - Per Urbancowgurl.File:Spined helm.png SpineTalkFile:Book of knowledge.png 22:29, January 17, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - This article is comprehensive for a new article, but it is no where near the standards of other featured articles. Nex, has a very short History section, which is mainly based on the news article Jagex released. Other commenters have also pointed out Nex's inadequate strategy section, right now the best strategy there is, is a link to a Youtube video. Finally, the article does not have enough images equally spread around the article, many parts are just plain text, while there are cluttered sections with too many images. Give Nex a few months, and I'm sure it will be developed to a much higher standard. 222 talk 00:30, January 18, 2011 (UTC) Neutral - Lots of information and its well written but could do with better special attack pics than just the ones that come from either a mass or youtube video, as for a strategy guide well that could easily be made from the rs forums theres plenty of guides by now so until those are resolved ill stay neutral i dont think those points are enough to oppose it, unlike those who will oppose for lack of a strategy guide, and not enough to support it either File:Defence cape (t).png Rabbit FearFile:Armadyl godsword.png 03:33, January 18, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - As much as I like the article since I helped write some of the material, the article is far from complete. There is still a lack of a thorough strategy guide on how to effectively deal with each of the forms. Also, some effects of Nex's attacks are still unknown. With that said, I don't believe the article is quite ready now. File:Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 12:37, January 18, 2011 (UTC) Oppose - Per above. The article is not close to being complete. Parts are still unwritten, and the article is way too lacking for it to be featured. Suppa chuppa Talk 15:13, January 18, 2011 (UTC) Withdraw - I'll nominate it in a couple of months again, if it got a better strategy guide. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 16:47, January 18, 2011 (UTC) 05:33, January 22, 2011 (UTC) Closed - Nominator withdrawal.--LiquidTalk 23:51, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software