About: Kuk Sool Won talk:Request for Adminship

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Kuk Sool Won talk:Request for Adminship Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Adminship should reflect that the community trusts a user. It seems unfair to expect people to have 500 edits on a small wiki. Unlike the English Wikipedia, it's much harder to make this many edits since a new wiki calls mostly for new content rather than small fixes. Also, it's up to the whole community to choose, so passing one person's test is not a fair measure. I suggest these guidelines be reduced to better reflect that any trusted user making good edits to the wiki for a certain period of time can be made an admin. If they later turn out to be problematic in that role, it's easy for staff to remove their access. Angela talk 08:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Kuk Sool Won talk:Request for Adminship
rdfs:comment	Adminship should reflect that the community trusts a user. It seems unfair to expect people to have 500 edits on a small wiki. Unlike the English Wikipedia, it's much harder to make this many edits since a new wiki calls mostly for new content rather than small fixes. Also, it's up to the whole community to choose, so passing one person's test is not a fair measure. I suggest these guidelines be reduced to better reflect that any trusted user making good edits to the wiki for a certain period of time can be made an admin. If they later turn out to be problematic in that role, it's easy for staff to remove their access. Angela talk 08:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:kuksoolwon/...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/464kn1QjnAE7Bq0VYC7jRg==
abstract	Adminship should reflect that the community trusts a user. It seems unfair to expect people to have 500 edits on a small wiki. Unlike the English Wikipedia, it's much harder to make this many edits since a new wiki calls mostly for new content rather than small fixes. Also, it's up to the whole community to choose, so passing one person's test is not a fair measure. I suggest these guidelines be reduced to better reflect that any trusted user making good edits to the wiki for a certain period of time can be made an admin. If they later turn out to be problematic in that role, it's easy for staff to remove their access. Angela talk 08:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC) I have three choices: You either are at least a fourth degree black belt or make a perfect score on a test about Kuk Sool Won. That way people who know a lot about Kuk Sool Won will have automatic acess to all pages. Otherwise you need to have quite a few edits. (I have about 750 edits and the wiki is only two months old) Jim\|witz 17:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software