| abstract
| - This guide is seriously out of date. Also, I suggest we add some additional clutter to the articles. You can see my proposal on User:Stabber#Tools for the GuildWiki Metagame. — Stabber (talk) 22:55, 9 April 2006 (CDT) (This is a repost from Stabber's talk page, since it's more appropriate to put this here.) Those templates (or, I suppose they're proto-templates at this point) seem useful. I would suggest flattening them out a bit more (so they're more like 1-2 lines of text in height) and changing up the icons a bit. That red exclamation point doesn't seem quite fitting. I'm not sure what a better alternative might be at this point, but I'll let you know if I think of anything. (Are they icons for Factions/Prophecies? Hmm, I guess we could make small ones based on the character creation intro art: how about some kind of arena-looking thing for Prophecies and an Asian-temple-looking thing for Factions?) --130.58 23:04, 9 April 2006 (CDT) Very much out of date. As someone trying hard not to read Style and formatting, I didnt even know it was around. --Xeeron 07:25, 10 April 2006 (CDT) ← Moved from User talk:Stabber I think the point of This build uses Prophecies-only skills is not that you HAVE to have ch1 to play it, but that you DO NOT have to have ch2 in order to. if a build contains ONLY one chapter's skills, it is not a limitation, but the thing that will allow more players to play it. I would make the This build uses skills from multiple campaigns tamplate red, while the others green, or green and blue, in addition of changing the text. Anyway, this is all very cleaver and useful. :] Foo 01:26, 10 April 2006 (CDT) I really really like the idea of the templates, I (at their current state) really dislike the content and appearance.
* First, they are to big and to bright. Unlike the big BEWARE THIS IS FACTIONS CONTENT AND NOT FINAL template, they should rather be smallish notes: 1.
* "This build uses Core skills" 2.
* "This build uses Core and Factions skills" 3.
* "This build uses Core and Prophecies skills" 4.
* "This build uses Core and Factions and Prophecies skills"
* Then I dislike the sentence "The opinions held by the author(s) of this article are not necessarily shared by this wiki or the general Guild Wars community." a lot. This is a wiki and each article, including builds, can be freely edited by anyone. So if the opinions are not shared by you, you should change the build (or discuss it on the talk page). I would prefer something along the lines of: "There are many different builds which may or may not suit you" --Xeeron 07:34, 10 April 2006 (CDT) But if I were to simply edit any article to add my pov, then I'm still leaving the article with some bias. There are many builds that I simply disagree with, but I am not going to edit them to conform to my narrow worldview. I think subjective content in the wiki should be clearly marked as such. — Stabber (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2006 (CDT)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)