About: Avatar Wiki:War Room/Series continuity episode   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

__NOWYSIWYG__ As I read the Appa's Lost Days page, on the series continuity section contains eight fact that has some described using the episode title written, and some others with reference. What I want to discuss here is, we should be consistent by using only one of the option I sum: 1. * We use the episode title written, ease people to know the continuity without double-click on the reference note, OR 2. * We can use the reference to save spaces. It's nicer and aesthetically well.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Avatar Wiki:War Room/Series continuity episode
rdfs:comment
  • __NOWYSIWYG__ As I read the Appa's Lost Days page, on the series continuity section contains eight fact that has some described using the episode title written, and some others with reference. What I want to discuss here is, we should be consistent by using only one of the option I sum: 1. * We use the episode title written, ease people to know the continuity without double-click on the reference note, OR 2. * We can use the reference to save spaces. It's nicer and aesthetically well.
dbkwik:avatar/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • __NOWYSIWYG__ As I read the Appa's Lost Days page, on the series continuity section contains eight fact that has some described using the episode title written, and some others with reference. What I want to discuss here is, we should be consistent by using only one of the option I sum: 1. * We use the episode title written, ease people to know the continuity without double-click on the reference note, OR 2. * We can use the reference to save spaces. It's nicer and aesthetically well. I'm in favor with the second option, but this doesn't mean I'm against the first option. Thoughts? 12:58, August 17, 2014 (UTC) The production notes have never been written in-universe and I've always been under the impression that standard practice was writing out the episode title, so I'm all for sticking with the first option. File:Waterbending emblem.png Water Spout 19:49, August 18, 2014 (UTC) Per its very purpose, series continuity -thus referring to the continuity among the episodes- it would be rather unnecessary complicated and unclear to make that section in universe. By purpose, that section is out of universe. For example, if we are going to make comparisons like "this move is the same as done by character X in episode Y", it would be rather unclear if that would be reworded as "this is the same move as done by character X fifty years prior during the siege of whatever". Furthermore, none of the "production notes" sub-headings are in-universe, so I see no reason why to start that practice with this one. 19:56, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software