About: Forum:Defining our project   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Currently, there is a lot of unevenness in the way we treat certain articles, as well as a lot of confusion over whether our project should or does cover certain types of articles. I thought it'd be a good idea to formally decide what types of articles we want to cover in our project, and what types we do not. Here are some of the categories of articles that may or may not fall under our purview:

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Forum:Defining our project
rdfs:comment
  • Currently, there is a lot of unevenness in the way we treat certain articles, as well as a lot of confusion over whether our project should or does cover certain types of articles. I thought it'd be a good idea to formally decide what types of articles we want to cover in our project, and what types we do not. Here are some of the categories of articles that may or may not fall under our purview:
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Currently, there is a lot of unevenness in the way we treat certain articles, as well as a lot of confusion over whether our project should or does cover certain types of articles. I thought it'd be a good idea to formally decide what types of articles we want to cover in our project, and what types we do not. Here are some of the categories of articles that may or may not fall under our purview: So, the question is, should we cover all of these categories? Should we drop a few we currently cover? Should we add a few we currently leave out? And, most importantly, how should we handle some of the categories for which we currently seem to be doing two different things (such as semi-sentient species)? ~ SavageBob 02:08, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software