Challenger, Columbus and Resolution need links. --Sasorizaa1 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I know I removed the link for Columbus on 18:41, 7 July 2006 Sneg (Talk | contribs) m (→== - Removed Star Trek: Columbus link - dead link) --Sneg 01:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Hmm... Should defunct RPGs be listed here? Maybe there should be separate pages or sections on the same page to separate active from inactive? I realize STEU shouldn't be an actual advertising outlet, per se, but if they're going to be listed, clarifying their current status serves several benefits. --Sasorizaa1 02:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I wondered about that (if I should delete defunct RPGs) but felt wrong completely deleting it wholesale. That's why I only took off the dead link. --Sneg 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Star Trek Expanded Universe talk:RPG directory
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Challenger, Columbus and Resolution need links. --Sasorizaa1 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I know I removed the link for Columbus on 18:41, 7 July 2006 Sneg (Talk | contribs) m (→== - Removed Star Trek: Columbus link - dead link) --Sneg 01:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Hmm... Should defunct RPGs be listed here? Maybe there should be separate pages or sections on the same page to separate active from inactive? I realize STEU shouldn't be an actual advertising outlet, per se, but if they're going to be listed, clarifying their current status serves several benefits. --Sasorizaa1 02:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I wondered about that (if I should delete defunct RPGs) but felt wrong completely deleting it wholesale. That's why I only took off the dead link. --Sneg 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| dbkwik:stexpanded/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Challenger, Columbus and Resolution need links. --Sasorizaa1 00:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I know I removed the link for Columbus on 18:41, 7 July 2006 Sneg (Talk | contribs) m (→== - Removed Star Trek: Columbus link - dead link) --Sneg 01:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Hmm... Should defunct RPGs be listed here? Maybe there should be separate pages or sections on the same page to separate active from inactive? I realize STEU shouldn't be an actual advertising outlet, per se, but if they're going to be listed, clarifying their current status serves several benefits. --Sasorizaa1 02:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC) I wondered about that (if I should delete defunct RPGs) but felt wrong completely deleting it wholesale. That's why I only took off the dead link. --Sneg 02:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)