About: Call of Duty 4 vs Pokémon Diamond/Pearl vs Super Mario Galaxy vs Team Fortress 2 2009   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The vastly overwhelming consensus for this match is even with Pokemon in the poll, Galaxy > Call of Duty 4 should have been a gimme match regardless of how strong most of us figured CoD4 would be. Galaxy was supposed to be a monster -- the one game universally beloved on the Wii despite everyone realizing how terrible the Wii is.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Call of Duty 4 vs Pokémon Diamond/Pearl vs Super Mario Galaxy vs Team Fortress 2 2009
rdfs:comment
  • The vastly overwhelming consensus for this match is even with Pokemon in the poll, Galaxy > Call of Duty 4 should have been a gimme match regardless of how strong most of us figured CoD4 would be. Galaxy was supposed to be a monster -- the one game universally beloved on the Wii despite everyone realizing how terrible the Wii is.
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:board8/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The vastly overwhelming consensus for this match is even with Pokemon in the poll, Galaxy > Call of Duty 4 should have been a gimme match regardless of how strong most of us figured CoD4 would be. Galaxy was supposed to be a monster -- the one game universally beloved on the Wii despite everyone realizing how terrible the Wii is. Then it comes out and threatens Starcraft's position as biggest bomb of the contest. Call of Duty 4 rocked Mario's face, and essentially guaranteed a Brawl > Galaxy result in round 2 given how well Brawl did in its poll a day prior to this. Even if you want to take the route of Pokemon LFFing Galaxy to a second place finish here, this still boded terrible for Galaxy. If a second-rate Pokemon title could leech Mario this badly, think what a Smash Brothers game would do. There was no amount of explaining that could brush off how badly Galaxy did here, and it would get waaaaaaaaaay worse in round 2.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software