About: Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Declined 77   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

[[File:Feathertail.star.png]] I'm not sure if I'm allowed post this, but nobody touched my reservation. Since Splook's was declined to time limit, Appledash took over but her reservation was outdated, and Splook reserved it again. But she needs to wait for two weeks to reclaim it, and only one week has passed. I might be very annoying right now, but I feel like if I don't post this, I will never get a chance to. I love Feathertail and I'm insanely proud of this, so I decided to give it a try. If someone's going to decline this with reasons, I'm not going to flip the world over, but... Now feel free to yell at me if you wish.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Declined 77
rdfs:comment
  • [[File:Feathertail.star.png]] I'm not sure if I'm allowed post this, but nobody touched my reservation. Since Splook's was declined to time limit, Appledash took over but her reservation was outdated, and Splook reserved it again. But she needs to wait for two weeks to reclaim it, and only one week has passed. I might be very annoying right now, but I feel like if I don't post this, I will never get a chance to. I love Feathertail and I'm insanely proud of this, so I decided to give it a try. If someone's going to decline this with reasons, I'm not going to flip the world over, but... Now feel free to yell at me if you wish.
dcterms:subject
abstract
  • [[File:Feathertail.star.png]] I'm not sure if I'm allowed post this, but nobody touched my reservation. Since Splook's was declined to time limit, Appledash took over but her reservation was outdated, and Splook reserved it again. But she needs to wait for two weeks to reclaim it, and only one week has passed. I might be very annoying right now, but I feel like if I don't post this, I will never get a chance to. I love Feathertail and I'm insanely proud of this, so I decided to give it a try. If someone's going to decline this with reasons, I'm not going to flip the world over, but... Now feel free to yell at me if you wish. Define the facial shading 14:22, August 28, 2015 (UTC) Actually when my time passed I asked a lead if it was okay if splook reserved this. They said yes and yeah...so technically its splook's. 16:04, August 28, 2015 (UTC) According to the guidelines, one must wait for two weeks after their image gets declined due to the one month limit. Even though this is the tweak page, I'm not sure why this would not apply. 16:14, August 28, 2015 (UTC) So one lead says yes, all leads have to agree? If someone else reserves it, the two week thing doesn't matter at all. The image is rightfully Splook's, as the two week thing applies to the approval page only. We never agreed for the tweak page as well. If Icy's ran out, and Splook took it, that nullifies the "limit" or anything of the sort. i do remember reserving this when icy's reservation ran out.. and i'm pretty sure it hasn't been 2 weeks since that so 19:38 Fri Aug 28 Okay Splook you can take this over if you like. I'm just saying it seems quite unfair but okay. But it's not unfair. It's very much within the rules. This is when Splook reserved the image, which is after Icy's reservation ran out. If someone reserved it after Splook's initial image got declined, then that nulls the two week thing...or it would have, if we had it for the tweak page. But, there is no "two week" ruling for the tweak page. I understand you're proud of the image, but it's not fair to Splook to enforce a rule that we don't actually have for this part of PCA. I mean, it was quite obvious why Icy reserved it... IANS: If you reserve an image, it's for you to do it, not to reserve it. Regardless, in the guidelines, it did not make expectations for tweak page time limits, so... 03:53, August 29, 2015 (UTC) Unless I'm missing it, I've never heard of a rule against reserving for others if they say/ask you to, so no one did anything wrong here. Nubface (talk) 10:02, August 29, 2015 (UTC) Well, *shrug* did I ever say it was in the guidelines? Although, we really do not need to be robotic enough to flat out follow completely what the guidelines says and not (which is pretty outdated by the way). One thing I'd like to point out is that it steals others' chances of trying a chance at the image, which is the whole point of why users must wait for two weeks before they can reserve it again. 10:15, August 29, 2015 (UTC) That is only for the approval page. And actually, before you assume that Icy wasn't going to post it, I'm pretty sure she was. It's kinda rude to assume that she wasn't ever going to post it. >.> But, she's been on vacation and she broke another one of her computers. When we came up with that, which was before you joined, Burnt, it was for the approval page, not the tweak page. We had multiple users get their images declined and then immediately try and post them again on the approval page. This rule does not exist for the tweak page. I'm sorry, but the image is Splook's, simple as that.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software