About: Patently offensive

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Patently offensive Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Patently offensive is a term that has been used by the U.S. Supreme Court in cases involving obscenity and the First Amendment. The phrase "patently offensive" first appeared in Roth v. United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public. The Roth standard outlined what is to be considered obscene and thus not protected by the First Amendment. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, writing for the majority in Roth, included the following definitions of what may be "patently offensive":

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Patently offensive
rdfs:comment	Patently offensive is a term that has been used by the U.S. Supreme Court in cases involving obscenity and the First Amendment. The phrase "patently offensive" first appeared in Roth v. United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public. The Roth standard outlined what is to be considered obscene and thus not protected by the First Amendment. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, writing for the majority in Roth, included the following definitions of what may be "patently offensive":
sameAs	dbr:Patently_offensive
dcterms:subject	Case-U.S.-Federal First Amendment Definition Case Case-U.S.-First Amendment Case-U.S.-Obscenity Obscenity
dbkwik:itlaw/prope...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/SN4_-8oiZ_OquUw3ahJT3g==
abstract	Patently offensive is a term that has been used by the U.S. Supreme Court in cases involving obscenity and the First Amendment. The phrase "patently offensive" first appeared in Roth v. United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public. The Roth standard outlined what is to be considered obscene and thus not protected by the First Amendment. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, writing for the majority in Roth, included the following definitions of what may be "patently offensive": * "Representations or descriptions of ultimate sex acts normal or perverted, actual or simulated." * "Representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, and lewd exhibitions of the genitals." The Roth standard was largely replaced by the "Miller" test established in Miller v. California.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software