About: RuneScape:Featured images/File:Lumbridge.png (delist)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

[[File:Lumbridge.png|250x250px|right]] Reason: Obsolete, replaced with new images all over the Lumbridge Castle page, the rest are gray/ugly too. Oh, and it's not used in mainspace. Nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive6#Lumbridge Closed - File:Yes check.svg The image will be deleted. Suppa chuppa Talk 02:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured images/File:Lumbridge.png (delist)
rdfs:comment
  • [[File:Lumbridge.png|250x250px|right]] Reason: Obsolete, replaced with new images all over the Lumbridge Castle page, the rest are gray/ugly too. Oh, and it's not used in mainspace. Nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive6#Lumbridge Closed - File:Yes check.svg The image will be deleted. Suppa chuppa Talk 02:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • [[File:Lumbridge.png|250x250px|right]] Reason: Obsolete, replaced with new images all over the Lumbridge Castle page, the rest are gray/ugly too. Oh, and it's not used in mainspace. Nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive6#Lumbridge * Support - As non-mainspace-image-keeler. 06:42, January 1, 2012 (UTC) Oh, and if this passes, I intend to delete it. 06:45, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Go ahead. Suppa chuppa Talk 06:45, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Delist - Per those whom have their names above me, and possibly those who will take their place below me. 06:46, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Per above. Smithing (talk | contribs) 06:48, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete, whatever you wanna do - (edit conflict x2) It's okay. File:Wink.svg 06:49, January 1, 2012 (UTC) * Support - But don't delete it. If anything, merge it with another file's history, but deleting something that used to be a FIMG for quite a while is a pity. Fswe1 10:11, January 1, 2012 (UTC) What would be the point in that when we already have duplicates of this in files histories? 02:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support, though I'd prefer a Replacement - Replacements are good. n_n File:Black cavalier detail.png Ninja DarkDoomOrb Talk File:Death.png 02:08, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Replacements are not good when the subject matter is just plain ugly. 02:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Grey on grey on white with a bit of green and blue File:Ring of kinship.png Ciphrius Kane File:Dungeoneering cape (t).png 02:19, January 2, 2012 (UTC) * Support - grey, grey and grey. What an interesting image. File:Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla File:Slayer-icon.png 17:39, January 3, 2012 (UTC) * Delist - But do not delete, pls. Ronan Talk 17:40, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Then what do you want to do with it? 21:31, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Add it to the page's gallery. Ronan Talk 21:59, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Uhh, why? It's a duplicate, or rather quadruplicate. 01:05, January 4, 2012 (UTC) It's a different image. Ronan Talk 10:19, January 4, 2012 (UTC) If you look on the Lumbridge Castle page, you'll see that is not the case. 18:16, January 4, 2012 (UTC) I did look. The fact that they're of the same subject does not make it a duplicate. If you can present a valid reason as to how this image hinders readers, bogs down servers, causes glitches or problems with the wiki, etc., then it should be removed. Otherwise, as a former featured image, there is no reason for it to be deleted. Ronan Talk 19:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Except that it's an obsolete duplicate of File:Lumbridge Castle.png.... Just look at the file history. 19:15, January 4, 2012 (UTC) A file's history can't be used on a page. If it was just a throwaway image, it would be a different case, but as a formerly featured file it should be placed somewhere on an article. Ronan Talk 19:27, January 4, 2012 (UTC) No one looking at the page will care that the image used to be featured... 03:12, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Apparently two people in this discussion alone do. I'm fine with it being delisted, but if you're intending to delete it please start an RfD. Ronan Talk 10:35, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support - Obsolete, duplicate. File:Adult chameleon (automatic).png Anurin Talk · Sign! . 12:45, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support and delete - Per nom left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 17:57, January 5, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete - Not up to standards and duplicate. --クールネシトーク 13:23, January 7, 2012 (UTC) * Support, delete - It meets the requirements for a speedy deletion. Be done with it (no RfD, that would just make a lengthy process that few care about). Hofmic Talk 18:28, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Closed - File:Yes check.svg The image will be deleted. Suppa chuppa Talk 02:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software