I see the {{delete}} tag usually added to the articles with the following useless or opinionated explanations:
* Unneeded
* Not needed
* Unnecessary
* Article not necessary
* ... I would like to ask to use valid reasons which qualify as criteria for deletion, such as: To sysops: if an article suggested for deletion does not meet the speedy deletion criteria, it should go through the AfD (e.g. the BloodClan battle that was deleted - if we have an article about the Great Journey, we can have one on the battle). Kind regards, 06:59, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - Warriors Wiki talk:Community Portal
|
rdfs:comment
| - I see the {{delete}} tag usually added to the articles with the following useless or opinionated explanations:
* Unneeded
* Not needed
* Unnecessary
* Article not necessary
* ... I would like to ask to use valid reasons which qualify as criteria for deletion, such as: To sysops: if an article suggested for deletion does not meet the speedy deletion criteria, it should go through the AfD (e.g. the BloodClan battle that was deleted - if we have an article about the Great Journey, we can have one on the battle). Kind regards, 06:59, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
dbkwik:warriors/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
listL
| |
listR
| |
abstract
| - I see the {{delete}} tag usually added to the articles with the following useless or opinionated explanations:
* Unneeded
* Not needed
* Unnecessary
* Article not necessary
* ... I would like to ask to use valid reasons which qualify as criteria for deletion, such as:
* Non-canon character
* Already covered in (...) article
* Misspaced article (e.g. should go to userspace)
* Does not meet criteria for inclusion (e.g. RP sites not meeting requirements)
* Not related to Warriors
* There was a consensus to not make such articles (e.g. unnamed characters)
* ... To sysops: if an article suggested for deletion does not meet the speedy deletion criteria, it should go through the AfD (e.g. the BloodClan battle that was deleted - if we have an article about the Great Journey, we can have one on the battle). Kind regards, 06:59, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
|