About: WoWWiki talk:Voting policy/Archive02

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: WoWWiki talk:Voting policy/Archive02 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I think a policy vote should be in a different category than non-policy voting such as deletion and so on. This way (or even in status quo) we can have a link in the sidebar for the list of votes. There are so many votes going on, and I have no idea what they are. Also, maybe we could have a user-maintained page that lists several high-profile votes, very abbreviated proposals, and what it means to the community. Any other ideas? Schmidt 08:11, 13 June 2006 (EDT)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	WoWWiki talk:Voting policy/Archive02
rdfs:comment	I think a policy vote should be in a different category than non-policy voting such as deletion and so on. This way (or even in status quo) we can have a link in the sidebar for the list of votes. There are so many votes going on, and I have no idea what they are. Also, maybe we could have a user-maintained page that lists several high-profile votes, very abbreviated proposals, and what it means to the community. Any other ideas? Schmidt 08:11, 13 June 2006 (EDT)
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/LryB3FiHP7LrIWqzyJ5P7A== dbkwik:resource/j5wa-CqgB07JNTgS9I4-aw== dbkwik:resource/OSt8UaH5oiERe6cUpJVDhg== dbkwik:resource/TmhIoPO6HbZmyT6DVElWqw== dbkwik:resource/Zhsh54BkA-ms_Y-84LdYSA== dbkwik:resource/yGeNTM9--NKXWtvJwimW5g== dbkwik:resource/qobRVfuPX9ZaGuBHMYJqpA== dbkwik:resource/ypEyr3pWfUgUpzvVJq2Dvw==
abstract	I think a policy vote should be in a different category than non-policy voting such as deletion and so on. This way (or even in status quo) we can have a link in the sidebar for the list of votes. There are so many votes going on, and I have no idea what they are. Also, maybe we could have a user-maintained page that lists several high-profile votes, very abbreviated proposals, and what it means to the community. Any other ideas? Schmidt 08:11, 13 June 2006 (EDT) I'll think on that one for a bit before I chip in with my .02File:Silver.png. Just one thing though: Deletion votes already live in their own category. --Mikk 08:47, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Ok, that was quick. No, I don't see the point in separating regular votes from policy votes. There just aren't that many. (See ). However, I agree with your idea of listing them + oneliner summaries somewhere. I'd suggest a new full-page wide box below the community portal. (On a sidenote, I've also been considering automating Village pump talk topic summaries there, but I need a working Linux box somewhere to run the script on. Mine is on the blink and I cba to fix it right now.) --Mikk 08:55, 13 June 2006 (EDT) (Call me restless) I created a sample page that could be included in a box in the community portal. See WoWWiki:Community_Portal/Democracy --Mikk 09:26, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Thanks. Good job. This works for what I was talking about. See, I miss so many policy votes it's not funny. Schmidt 11:47, 13 June 2006 (EDT) Heh, and here I was wondering why I never see you voting for or against policies :-) Anyway, I linked it into the community portal now. --Mikk 12:07, 13 June 2006 (EDT)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software