About: Baker Street Wiki:Requests for adminship/Archive

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Baker Street Wiki:Requests for adminship/Archive Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Okay, after being here for almost two months, I know I'm really getting a feel for this wiki and how it works. There were a few incidents at first, but I know I have learned from them, and continue to learn. Part of the reason for me asking for admin rights again is because of the inactivity of three of the four other admins, and the knowledge that a single active admin cannot handle an entire wiki. Another part is because I feel like the work I do can be better augmented with the abilities that admin rights would grant me. Aside from formatting a significant number of pages here (and I will get to the other ones soon), I have also created a few templates to aid in the wiki, and have begun work with rewriting pages. You can see a list here. Once again, if admin rights aren't on the table r

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Baker Street Wiki:Requests for adminship/Archive
rdfs:comment	Okay, after being here for almost two months, I know I'm really getting a feel for this wiki and how it works. There were a few incidents at first, but I know I have learned from them, and continue to learn. Part of the reason for me asking for admin rights again is because of the inactivity of three of the four other admins, and the knowledge that a single active admin cannot handle an entire wiki. Another part is because I feel like the work I do can be better augmented with the abilities that admin rights would grant me. Aside from formatting a significant number of pages here (and I will get to the other ones soon), I have also created a few templates to aid in the wiki, and have begun work with rewriting pages. You can see a list here. Once again, if admin rights aren't on the table r
dcterms:subject	Site administration
dbkwik:bakerstreet...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/P544U0NaSwWLvCwk4nw-cQ== dbkwik:resource/gCQlMs4SZtUYs62BdVpMUw==
abstract	Okay, after being here for almost two months, I know I'm really getting a feel for this wiki and how it works. There were a few incidents at first, but I know I have learned from them, and continue to learn. Part of the reason for me asking for admin rights again is because of the inactivity of three of the four other admins, and the knowledge that a single active admin cannot handle an entire wiki. Another part is because I feel like the work I do can be better augmented with the abilities that admin rights would grant me. Aside from formatting a significant number of pages here (and I will get to the other ones soon), I have also created a few templates to aid in the wiki, and have begun work with rewriting pages. You can see a list here. Once again, if admin rights aren't on the table right now, I would like to ask for rollback rights instead, if the community deem it appropriate. For the same reason as last time, I just feel like that presence would not be detrimental to the wiki. Thanks for your time! 12:03, June 9, 2014 (UTC)Support 1. * Why you support this user ... (Usersignature)Oppose 1. * I don't see the need of having a new admin at the moment. There are not even ten active contributors here in the wiki. We, ourselves, "argue" with one another often and AO is good enough to be the moderator and somewhat of a peacemaker. --Sherrinford (talk) 04:47, June 10, 2014 (UTC) 2. * I have to agree with Sherrinford, the need for another active admin would be pretty redundant at the moment, as we are still a relatively small community. Also, eligibility for administrator shouldn't be based on editcount, but rather on actual contributions to the wiki. A large majority of your edits are minor formatting changes to articles made using a bot program. While these edits aren't detrimental to the wiki or anything, they aren't really expanding the wiki either. What I like to see is users who make actual contributions—adding onto previously made articles or creating new ones—not users who make a ton of minuscule and superfluous edits. --Nxtstep101 (talk) 18:41, June 10, 2014 (UTC) 3. * Oppose. Looking at the edit conflicts between Fruipit and other users, I don't think this user has the skills necessary to engage with users that they disagree with on certain editing issues. I also agree with the points Nxtstep has made. It's a really small community, so we don't need another admin at the moment. ~Obi (Talk) 06:24, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software