About: Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 2

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 2 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I just need opinions. When a user is blocked for good, should their blog posts be deleted? Dan the Man 1983 18:09, August 21, 2010 (UTC) I'd say usually it should but administrators may decline to delete it at their discretion. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 20:55, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Yes, I think it should, since no one but admins can really edit it. Jenny Vincent♣ 21:04, September 1, 2010 (UTC) I agree with deleting them, but if it was an argument or dispute in a blog that cause them to be blocked, I say leave that blog post on the wiki as proof, so to speak. Which brings me to another point, which me and Jeff seem to differ in our views on. When a user is blocked for good, should we let them keep their ability to edit and use their talk page, or should we take it away

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Bully Wiki:Community Noticeboard/Archive 2
rdfs:comment	I just need opinions. When a user is blocked for good, should their blog posts be deleted? Dan the Man 1983 18:09, August 21, 2010 (UTC) I'd say usually it should but administrators may decline to delete it at their discretion. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 20:55, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Yes, I think it should, since no one but admins can really edit it. Jenny Vincent♣ 21:04, September 1, 2010 (UTC) I agree with deleting them, but if it was an argument or dispute in a blog that cause them to be blocked, I say leave that blog post on the wiki as proof, so to speak. Which brings me to another point, which me and Jeff seem to differ in our views on. When a user is blocked for good, should we let them keep their ability to edit and use their talk page, or should we take it away
dbkwik:bully/prope...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/gxLaWx2mPILFAMlnQsOwfw==
abstract	I just need opinions. When a user is blocked for good, should their blog posts be deleted? Dan the Man 1983 18:09, August 21, 2010 (UTC) I'd say usually it should but administrators may decline to delete it at their discretion. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 20:55, September 1, 2010 (UTC) Yes, I think it should, since no one but admins can really edit it. Jenny Vincent♣ 21:04, September 1, 2010 (UTC) I agree with deleting them, but if it was an argument or dispute in a blog that cause them to be blocked, I say leave that blog post on the wiki as proof, so to speak. Which brings me to another point, which me and Jeff seem to differ in our views on. When a user is blocked for good, should we let them keep their ability to edit and use their talk page, or should we take it away? Dan the Man 1983 03:03, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Yeah, proof's good. And don't let them keep it, because then there'll be a LOT of complaining and insults since they'll have a "I can't get banned anymore!" additude. Jenny Vincent♣ 03:08, September 2, 2010 (UTC) That's exactly the reason why I don't let them have the ability to use their talk page once they're blocked for good. Incase they insult, or disrupt their talk page with spam. What else do they have to lose? They're blocked already. If they want to say sorry, well they should have thought of the consequences of their actions before being blocked. Dan the Man 1983 03:15, September 2, 2010 (UTC) Ok, I'm not no Admin but I'll give you my opinion, I mean I don't think we should delete everything you got to give them a chance for example: karensarahrocks's blog is still there but should we delete it? I think it shouldn't be deleted and we should let them edit their own talk page, as long as they don't screw up, If they spam once again no more blog or talk page for them. So if they keep editing their talk page and prove they won't do anything bad then you can unblock them, but they should only get one chance so you'll know if they change. TheAgeofRockstar 16:50, September 6, 2010 (UTC) If we need proof, then I think it should be posted on the user page or the talk page. Blogs should be deleted, and if they have proof then someone should be sure to add the proof to either the talk page or user page. Jenny Vincent♣ 18:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software