About: PvXwiki talk:True Build Ratings   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This is an articulate, detailed method of rating builds. Shireen 07:20, 12 May 2007 (CEST) I believe the word you're looking for is "complicated". --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 08:00, 12 May 2007 (CEST) No Zerris! I think she means "Articulate" or "Articulated". And no, just because its 2 AM you have no excuse :p. Readem (talk*contribs) 08:32, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Thanks for the save Shireen 08:37, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Actually, I was refering to the build proposal in general, and not to any spelling mistakes which may or may not have been made. --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 22:40, 12 May 2007 (CEST) lolz -_-. Readem (talk*contribs) 00:52, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • PvXwiki talk:True Build Ratings
rdfs:comment
  • This is an articulate, detailed method of rating builds. Shireen 07:20, 12 May 2007 (CEST) I believe the word you're looking for is "complicated". --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 08:00, 12 May 2007 (CEST) No Zerris! I think she means "Articulate" or "Articulated". And no, just because its 2 AM you have no excuse :p. Readem (talk*contribs) 08:32, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Thanks for the save Shireen 08:37, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Actually, I was refering to the build proposal in general, and not to any spelling mistakes which may or may not have been made. --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 22:40, 12 May 2007 (CEST) lolz -_-. Readem (talk*contribs) 00:52, 13 May 2007 (CEST)
dbkwik:pvx/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • This is an articulate, detailed method of rating builds. Shireen 07:20, 12 May 2007 (CEST) I believe the word you're looking for is "complicated". --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 08:00, 12 May 2007 (CEST) No Zerris! I think she means "Articulate" or "Articulated". And no, just because its 2 AM you have no excuse :p. Readem (talk*contribs) 08:32, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Thanks for the save Shireen 08:37, 12 May 2007 (CEST) Actually, I was refering to the build proposal in general, and not to any spelling mistakes which may or may not have been made. --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 22:40, 12 May 2007 (CEST) lolz -_-. Readem (talk*contribs) 00:52, 13 May 2007 (CEST) The word your looking for is 'detailed' =) With the proposed user interface for this system it would be really user friendly IMOP. Shireen 10:11, 13 May 2007 (CEST) i think its a great idea. it could be simplified a little bit but over all i give it two thumbs up. No_Walrus 8:57, 17 May 2007 If you can simplify it to the point where somebody would not read a manual to rate a build, that might help. --Image:Rollerzerris.jpg 06:37, 18 May 2007 (CEST) The proposal is detailed to be specific as what the system should be. A picture is worth a thousand words, but alas, I am no graphic arts major. The proposed User Forms, if built to my imagination, would be very easy and simplistic. Think of it like filling out an easy bubble survey to rate the builds. Shireen 07:24, 18 May 2007 (CEST)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software