About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

It is useful for anything from bringing a doomed article back from the brink of damnation to improving upon a completed article written by Jesus himself. It is an author's job to improve the article based on the feedback given. Please don't make a Pee Review request solely to show off your work with no intention of changing it. If you are not going to take the criticism to heart one way or the other, don't bother requesting it. If you request a review, you can add the template to the article to make sure nothing happens to it until the review is finished.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
rdfs:comment
  • It is useful for anything from bringing a doomed article back from the brink of damnation to improving upon a completed article written by Jesus himself. It is an author's job to improve the article based on the feedback given. Please don't make a Pee Review request solely to show off your work with no intention of changing it. If you are not going to take the criticism to heart one way or the other, don't bother requesting it. If you request a review, you can add the template to the article to make sure nothing happens to it until the review is finished.
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • It is useful for anything from bringing a doomed article back from the brink of damnation to improving upon a completed article written by Jesus himself. It is an author's job to improve the article based on the feedback given. Please don't make a Pee Review request solely to show off your work with no intention of changing it. If you are not going to take the criticism to heart one way or the other, don't bother requesting it. If you request a review, you can add the template to the article to make sure nothing happens to it until the review is finished. Reviewers are provided with a table to fill out that focuses on the important areas of a good Uncyclopedia article. When a new pee review request is made, one pre-made table will be put on the page allowing reviewers to fill out the table as appropriate providing a "Full" review. Alternatively reviewers can make brief comments on the page above the table, providing suggestions on improvement or useful advice. Adding brief comments will keep the review in the queue of waiting reviews so that other people can still see it. If you wish to do a full review (using the table) please make sure that you have thoroughly read the the Guidelines. Please don't fill out the table unless you have. When a full review has been given the review will be removed from the queue. If you don't have anything constructive to say, don't say anything at all. An in-depth review is always better than one that is all score and no comment. The best reviews explain why scores are given and provide specific ideas, concepts, and suggestions for improvement.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software