rdfs:comment
| - Hey everyone, it's Miles. I've long planned to RfB, and there are a variety of reasons that I believe show my merits and would prove that I am worthy of becoming a bureaucrat of SmashWiki.
* Activity level. As Shadowcrest pointed out in his (successful) RfB, "In terms of activity, I'd say I'm more active than every other admin except maybe Miles." I'm on SmashWiki almost every day at least long enough to check my watchlist and deal with any pressing wiki issues. Some days I work on more major edits or do random editing, and as such am on even longer. If promoted, I'd be able to regularly check the status of other requests for promotions.
* Great record as a sysop. Since becoming a sysop back in December, I've deleted spam pages and non-notable smasher articles, blocked vandals, made
|
abstract
| - Hey everyone, it's Miles. I've long planned to RfB, and there are a variety of reasons that I believe show my merits and would prove that I am worthy of becoming a bureaucrat of SmashWiki.
* Activity level. As Shadowcrest pointed out in his (successful) RfB, "In terms of activity, I'd say I'm more active than every other admin except maybe Miles." I'm on SmashWiki almost every day at least long enough to check my watchlist and deal with any pressing wiki issues. Some days I work on more major edits or do random editing, and as such am on even longer. If promoted, I'd be able to regularly check the status of other requests for promotions.
* Great record as a sysop. Since becoming a sysop back in December, I've deleted spam pages and non-notable smasher articles, blocked vandals, made appropriate protections, managed disputes and helped new users. I've also shown a good record with rollback powers since I acquired that ability previously.
* Long record of contributions to SmashWiki. I recently became SmashWiki's top contributor, and I'd like to think I got there on both quality and quantity. I've also helped with the Smash Arena and the Featured Article systems at various points. (All of these snippets since #13 except one were written by yours truly.)
* Objective viewpoint. I feel I would bring a clear mind and even disposition to the review of requests for promotion, being able to judge the consensus of the community and acting accordingly.
* I'd also like to point out that having three active bureaucrats (myself in addition to Clarinet Hawk and Shadowcrest) would create redundancy in the system, making sure there is always someone available to manage issues and requests for promotion.
* My RfA, my contributions, my edit count. Thank you for reading and, in advance, for commenting. Miles (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
|