I've listed this article for peer review because as the major contributor to the page a second set of eyes would be great both for itself and a potential GA. Its also a current topic with several thousand hits a day, possibly mentioned in the media soon too. Would particualrly like to check for grammar and overlink. I think refs are fine, but if the reviewer sees something else id be glad to crrect it. Thanks, Lihaas (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate | |
abstract |
|