Despite being regularly edited since 2012, the article still contains no reliable sources to back up any of its numerous claims. Citation needed tags continue to be removed even after warnings and blocks have been issued in the past. I have confirmed in-game that at least a portion of the unverified material is false, which leads me to believe that the majority or entirety of the article follows this trend. I also have concerns regarding the article's usage as a tool to assist with in-game scams, as several instances of vandalism have claimed. This would also explain the persistent removals of citation needed tags. - John Pot (talk) 09:41, July 24, 2014 (UTC)