Fine, let us discuss. For what reason do you think THIS should be deleted?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 21:52, May 12, 2013 (UTC) Based on this discussion: It was decided not to add baseless assumptions on why Numbers have their numbers. The second point of trivia is unimportant. No other Number has, "This number is the first in the fifties/seventies/eighties" because it is ridiculous to document it. 190.124.165.194 (talk) 21:55, May 12, 2013 (UTC) Ridiculous on what assumption? Are you saying this card is not the 4th rank 7 monster to be introduced, and that it is not the first 7ss Number in TCG?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 22:00, May 12, 2013 (UTC) Yes, that assumption is highly dubious, unconfirmed, and very unoriginal (like they would specifically plan f