I've listed this article for peer review because I have been told that it is getting close to FA, and I would like to know what improvements could be made. Thanks, StringTheory11 18:46, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Wow. I had a look through this article and found it to be quite a demanding read, compared to descriptive chemistry. Might partly explain the lack of feedback. Anyway, here are some comments about the lead. I've expressed them as questions and inconsistencies that came to mind as I was going, rather than as suggested changes: The Rambling Man (talk) 20:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)