Was reviewd by User:Modusoperandi I've rewritten on his advice so I've put it up for review again.. 12:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC) * Thanks for the review, will improve the article when I get home on this advice, I'm thinking of completely removing(replacing is the correct word) the second section because it doesn't tie in, I'll re-write the first on what you've said and try and make it flow, I've had flow issues with the other I have to re-write this weekend. Thanks for the review, its definately helpful. --. 16:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)