an Entity in Data Space: 134.155.108.49:8890
The court held that a state National Guard member could not be discharged for saying publicly that he is gay—but could be excluded from any of the many positions in the Guard that require federal recognition. Although Clinton intended the policy as a step forward in defending the rights of gays to serve in the military, in fact it continued harming the gay soldiers, sailors and others, who now had to lie covering up their identity and sexual orientation to keep their jobs.
Identifier (URI) | Rank |
---|---|
dbkwik:resource/Xchr-IKnxT7D9jkdaSMbcQ== | 5.88129e-14 |
dbr:Holmes_v._California_National_Guard | 5.88129e-14 |