I have finished this page's rewrite, and would like for anyone interested/inquisitive to please review it/ask questions here. Thanks! 14:44, February 2, 2016 (UTC) I think it's pretty great, but I'd change a couple things: * "articles are judged against the featured article criteria, then passed or rejected according to community consensus." I'd change "community consensus" to "committee", since the co-ordinator of the project is just one person - as the nominations page proposal suggests, at least. Despite it being normally against my beliefs, I feel having a smaller group of people selected by the community handle FAs is actually beneficial, it can prevent a tyranny of the majority scenario and ensures only experienced writers have quality control over what really is the selection of