After working on this article to remove copyvio, sources that don't back the claims, puffery, and looking at the talk page and the scant mention of this company in the sources added to make it notable (which only mention it as one among others), and doing a search, I've come to the conclusion that this company doesn't meet our criteria at WP:ORG. Dougweller (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)