I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get advice on how to improve it. Please let me know if there is anything that should be fixed, reworded, clarified or corrected, or if there is a problem with images or prose. The article is already a GA. Thanks, Surtsicna (talk) 19:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC) That's the lead. Or most of it, at least. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)