OpenLink Software

Usage stats on Forum:SH Archive/A 'Current Rankings' thing for the Featured Articles page?

 Permalink

an Entity in Data Space: 134.155.108.49:8890

Should we put one of these on the FA page? I think it worked well on the Improvement Drive page. What do you guys think? Skywalka 07:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC) * It wouldn't make sense in the context of how FAs are chosen. Unlike Improvement Drive articles, an FA is not just chosen because it has the most votes. If an FA has 5 votes and no objections, it automatically goes in the FA queue. If there are any objections, they must be resolved before it can be added to the queue. So there is no need for rankings, because theoretically any number of articles could be added per week if they had no objections and 5 votes. Does that make sense? - Breathesgelatin 07:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC) * Yep, thanks. I guess this isn't really needed then. Sorry, I wasn't aware of how the FA's were choosen. S

Identifier (URI)Rank
dbkwik:resource/or6RASdzsTAXppddjr657g==5.88129e-14
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] This material is Open Knowledge Creative Commons License Valid XHTML + RDFa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software