OpenLink Software

Usage stats on PvXwiki talk:Vetting Restructure

 Permalink

an Entity in Data Space: 134.155.108.49:8890

Disagree with your proposed policy on "theorycraft", but I am 100% for more guides.--Kammorremae 21:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Fuck the whole vetting process, meta or not but consensus. All other builds in user space. Move rating system to the user space, keep it for meta, but it doesn't actually mean anything. Score goes on page, don't moderate votes at all. The meta/not meta section becomes the section that matters. Possibly have an experimental section for pre-meta, but to be honest, we don't vet non-meta anyway so we don't need it. Only ONE build has ever entered the PvP metagame from PvX, Contagionway, anything else was meta before vetted. Image:Misery Cow.pngMisery Says Moo 21:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Are you sure contagionway came from PvX? I swear I saw it in HA before I saw it on PvX ;o -

Graph IRICount
http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org5
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] This material is Open Knowledge Creative Commons License Valid XHTML + RDFa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software