OpenLink Software

Usage stats on Forum:Species guidelines

 Permalink

an Entity in Data Space: 134.155.108.49:8890

I was thinking of introducing some standard sections for our species articles. From the articles I see 4 main sections that tend to cover most: 1) Biology, 2) Culture, 3) History, 4)[Insert name here] in the galaxy. Within these main sections, various subsections may be appropriate. Is it worth trying to standardise the articles? Having suggested these four sections, I'm aware that in fact Chiss, Squib, Ewok or Gamorrean exactly match these! --Eyrezer 10:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Graph IRICount
http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org5
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] This material is Open Knowledge Creative Commons License Valid XHTML + RDFa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software