This HTML5 document contains 8 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kP8KClggoB1Mmap_DuqCbQ==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/iF4ZNDOhDhdKcprFcZV94A==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Vv8myydoI2m7BQeFaiEXog==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/-GgYdTVV6VXtcTOBLXr-mg==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/g6pDuWJeSFES15Zr7rH-KA==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/memory-alpha/property/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/7_uFwnm_bJdehvqIJ6-Dtw==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Memory Alpha:Peer review
rdfs:comment
To request a peer review for a section of an article, or the entire article, follow these steps: 1. * Place the template on top of the section you want to be peer reviewed. For an entire article, place {{peer review|article}} at the top of the of the article below any disambiguations and sidebar. 1. * Create a new section on the talk page using the title "Peer review", or an alternate title of your choice. See here for instructions on how to use alternate titles with the template.
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n6: n7: n8: n9:
n10:abstract
To request a peer review for a section of an article, or the entire article, follow these steps: 1. * Place the template on top of the section you want to be peer reviewed. For an entire article, place {{peer review|article}} at the top of the of the article below any disambiguations and sidebar. 1. * Create a new section on the talk page using the title "Peer review", or an alternate title of your choice. See here for instructions on how to use alternate titles with the template. While everyone is invited to improve the article, requesting a peer review first and foremost means that you are willing to actively participate in the process by responding to and resolving issues brought up on the talk page. Please do not request a peer review if the article still has obvious flaws. In that case, consider using one of the pages needing attention procedures instead. Also, do not request a peer review if you don't plan to play an active role in the process.