This HTML5 document contains 6 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/stexpanded/property/
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DO4GRSSrS__sycAXAxW5SA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1SQP9vUAkzehcADsOIh4BQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/-j7yMFPw9AUDQc3fac7iVQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/VLtQkk2OsLhHmmzhlZQbcQ==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Star Trek Expanded Universe talk:Citation
rdfs:comment
1) I was wondering about this section (in Unsourced material): 1. * If it is doubtful but not harmful to the whole article or to STEU, go back and remove the {{nosource}} tag if no source is produced within a reasonable time. Should it be taken out, since we're pretty strict on sources here? Just wondering. --Hawku 17:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n7: n8:
n3:abstract
1) I was wondering about this section (in Unsourced material): 1. * If it is doubtful but not harmful to the whole article or to STEU, go back and remove the {{nosource}} tag if no source is produced within a reasonable time. Should it be taken out, since we're pretty strict on sources here? Just wondering. --Hawku 17:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)