This HTML5 document contains 15 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/zQvuSUgYECkQq8wtLFi-Cw==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/glpQq486O70I1fGMQPUB7g==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/z1VnKwdv7ZabbBmiVv1Xfg==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/allthetropes/property/
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/NuPM_evjwWX_343FxTsQFg==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/xcXlQa8d0IhbFDe_dK5b4g==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/dSQrHUyrr3pbBubcq9mKug==
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/RZFJc1qmgs8KtbXjHLzJgw==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DA8x9qH3FxjLtSK2fz_9FA==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/yxDn5PhafHQ-ggXyYqHwRA==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/hMqxxnqb8mftw8U1T187wA==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1TNA-nX1tDaUvFdjYq2PYw==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/HdqQrIRgXjb17BCuBvsdOg==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZEKmU1FCoyLjobVxpyKZZA==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/all-the-tropes/property/
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Liar Game/WMG
rdfs:comment
Most of the previous games have had an obvious theme and a more subtle "real theme". Minority rule seemed to be about psychology and guessing how people will vote, but it was actually about using teamwork to eliminate psychology from the equation. Contraband seemed to be about out-guessing your opponent, but was actually about loyalty, the interests of the individual versus those of the team. The fourth round seems to be about convincing people that you're normal so they'll make contact with you, but it will actually turn out to be about sacrifice.
dcterms:subject
n4: n7: n8: n13: n14: n17:
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n16: n18:
n9:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n10: n11: n19:
n15:abstract
Most of the previous games have had an obvious theme and a more subtle "real theme". Minority rule seemed to be about psychology and guessing how people will vote, but it was actually about using teamwork to eliminate psychology from the equation. Contraband seemed to be about out-guessing your opponent, but was actually about loyalty, the interests of the individual versus those of the team. The fourth round seems to be about convincing people that you're normal so they'll make contact with you, but it will actually turn out to be about sacrifice. * * A team of seven people willing to be honest with each-other can get six of its members through to the fourth round. First all infected people in the group single themselves out. Then one or two designated "doctors" get two vaccines each and cure the infected person then themselves. Once the entire team is infection free they can theoretically create 4 vaccines each, but since only 6 can proceed to the next round one will have to drop. There is no worry about infected people pretending to be normal since they have nothing to gain by it. * The only trouble is choosing the sacrifice. The other 6 would obviously agree to save them, but it still requires that the volunteer trust them. Akagi seems the obvious choice, as he may be willing to trust Akiyama and Nao, and volunteering would achieve his stated goal of helping them and eliminating Yokoya. However, Yokoya will also have was ways of forcing someone to become his sacrifice. In that case it will turn into a race to get enough team-members, something Yokoya is very good at, so Akiyama will have to come up with some plot that totally invalidates my 'team of seven' plan above, and results in them both going through to a final showdown in the actual fourth round. * They already created teams in the Minority Game. And it went horribly, HORRIBLY wrong. I am not sure if they will try the same strategy again. But, on the other hand, the strategy was good, the only problem was that someone was exploiting it.