This HTML5 document contains 6 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/dVHWucRHD62mPhq1mwQiIQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/g6pDuWJeSFES15Zr7rH-KA==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/AZJSKrFzLQ9gMNJ-k_8JvQ==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/memory-alpha/property/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/3K0LtEPsx1-9V_T9ZciXMg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Memory Alpha talk:Renaming articles
rdfs:comment
My suggestion for a notice and guideline for renaming articles, so we don't have to use other PNA messages for problems with the article titles, as well as keeping track of and highlighting these discussions. MediaWiki:Recentchangestext, , and Memory Alpha:Pages needing attention would be updated to incorporate this. Thoughts? - 01:08, January 26, 2012 (UTC) That's fine with me. We could also have and redirect to and , respectively. - 18:24, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n7: n8:
n3:abstract
My suggestion for a notice and guideline for renaming articles, so we don't have to use other PNA messages for problems with the article titles, as well as keeping track of and highlighting these discussions. MediaWiki:Recentchangestext, , and Memory Alpha:Pages needing attention would be updated to incorporate this. Thoughts? - 01:08, January 26, 2012 (UTC) Seems good to me. --31dot 01:39, January 26, 2012 (UTC) I agree~. --Pseudohuman 04:36, January 26, 2012 (UTC) Could we call the template just "rename"? I hate because it always takes me a few tries to figure out what we called it and how it was capitalised. The "with" or "to" just complicates things unnecessarily. Other than that, great idea.–Cleanse ( talk | contribs ) 09:41, January 26, 2012 (UTC) That's fine with me. We could also have and redirect to and , respectively. - 18:24, January 26, 2012 (UTC)