This HTML5 document contains 26 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/NQ1gCY8duv0v2JGPyBThsA==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/flNXXJY8fRYSIJ0J4MW1mw==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GT4vQZVuG9lIzRpsDz3opw==
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1gQvRAUWh27QiEg7ndXUuQ==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Hg4EjaBR7aLHSAmO0dkSMg==
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kB6sDaJpKkP7ooVoYVQg7g==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/xBX0M0kTRxKa5PVopYlgxg==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/LXyX5pJdyS3MNZpwO6dNUA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/mguBzUPzRMjHUAUIY25p9Q==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/3h6R_LPBnTt7tl6q-bOIDw==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Ctc9dpc1_-5rtlNL7TVrBg==
n28http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/KWQKSf6QGzRZsHW0mZDGyg==
n19http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/WPY1Gkt4DmLPT4E4dSqzAA==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n26http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ePzHdEbOZ6pnSyGNrC4hWw==
n25http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Cnc4JfU6U6MMAvAix_QbLg==
n30http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/TgOVbXtoSofCtrjpr1F5Hw==
n21http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/GJ0696IywAmQMiycZ41ZmA==
n24http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/__VZt4ZkorgqeBDkxy8D8A==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/companyofheroes/property/
n27http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/jzjZPnzNXYXr8haTK2i_xg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/h_FljxpWDAl0VaM85-6mOA==
n23http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/K-eLA1Bv0iGzIuO1KFsw4g==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DmdRXU-Bv1cKhjY7fxGy2Q==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/-w97rAWRWe8zN_gRk1CkgQ==
n29http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/6yYOQ-nAJRUixBkk5-yJsw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n31http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Ye1vVFj5qv6lzhGcgPAhoA==
n22http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qnL4TEXPl9I6W-1g6qtMzg==
Subject Item
n2:
rdf:type
n5:
rdfs:label
Staghound Armored Car
rdfs:comment
While it has a functioning main gun, unlike the Cromwell Command Tank, its better suited against infantry and light to medium vehicles, with only a 37mm gun. More than 1 may be produced, too. However, the Staghound doesn't provide any bonuses to other British tanks. It is practically the same model as the American T17, albeit there are several differences. The Staghound, for instance, cannot use Phosphorus rounds to blind enemy vehicles.
dcterms:subject
n7: n13: n29:
n14:
*Costs
n18:
None
n11:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n12: n19: n23: n24: n25: n31:
n26:
6.5
n28:
Light
n20:
Medium scout vehicle
n30:
Yeah, there's no picture.
n27:
0
n21:
M6 37mm Gun
n3:
n4: Staghound Armored Car
n15:
n16:
n9:
n10:
n22:
1
n17:abstract
While it has a functioning main gun, unlike the Cromwell Command Tank, its better suited against infantry and light to medium vehicles, with only a 37mm gun. More than 1 may be produced, too. However, the Staghound doesn't provide any bonuses to other British tanks. It is practically the same model as the American T17, albeit there are several differences. The Staghound, for instance, cannot use Phosphorus rounds to blind enemy vehicles. Despite having the same weapons as the T17, the Staghound easily suppresses enemy infantry once it is upgraded with a 50.cal MG. This makes the Stuart obsolete once Staghounds are obtainable, as both vehicles require the same amount of resources, yet the Staghound has more health, which is odd (An armoured car has more health than a tank). A Staghound with a Sherman Firefly are forces to be reckoned with, and should be avoided or destroyed quickly, as the awesome AT power of the Firefly combined with the suppressing ability of the Staghound is a deadly combination. It might be best to completely avoid a British defense line supplemented with the two.