This HTML5 document contains 6 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Avatar Wiki:War Room/Future Industries category

rdfs:comment

__NOWYSIWYG__ Taking into account the people, locations, and objects associated with Future Industries; I would say we have enough articles to create a category for the organization. What do you guys think? BenignSpirit 23:33, November 11, 2017 (UTC)

n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate

n6: n7: n8:

n4:abstract

__NOWYSIWYG__ Taking into account the people, locations, and objects associated with Future Industries; I would say we have enough articles to create a category for the organization. What do you guys think? BenignSpirit 23:33, November 11, 2017 (UTC) Hmm, to be honest, I don’t really see the added informational and navigational value of such a category. 08:35, November 12, 2017 (UTC) Well, seeing as we already have categories for other organizations, why not? Just as a general note, the reason why new categories need community consensus is to try to only have relevant and useful categories on our pages, and we don't really operate according to a "because we can" and "we have A, so why not B"-type of reasoning. 19:47, November 13, 2017 (UTC)