This HTML5 document contains 4 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

Warriors Wiki talk:Charart/Accepted 131

rdfs:comment

File:Darkstripe.rogue.alt3.png silver and black tabby aka I stole Dreamcatcher's coloring. Define the shading a little bit? ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 09:10, January 1, 2015 (UTC) Perhaps make the pupil bigger? It kind of gives off the appearance of being just horizontal. ♠Pinely ~Anything Is Possible 09:11, January 1, 2015 (UTC) This is what I usually do with my eyes, and the style is my choice, so I'd rather not change that. The white itself is one pixel, and then I use different colors for anywhere from three to six pixels, depending on what I feel like at the time. I defined the shading, though.

dcterms:subject

n5:

n6:abstract

File:Darkstripe.rogue.alt3.png silver and black tabby aka I stole Dreamcatcher's coloring. Define the shading a little bit? ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 09:10, January 1, 2015 (UTC) Perhaps make the pupil bigger? It kind of gives off the appearance of being just horizontal. ♠Pinely ~Anything Is Possible 09:11, January 1, 2015 (UTC) This is what I usually do with my eyes, and the style is my choice, so I'd rather not change that. The white itself is one pixel, and then I use different colors for anywhere from three to six pixels, depending on what I feel like at the time. I defined the shading, though. Smoothen out the stripes maybe? kind look rugged and shaky. (Or is it supposed to be like that?) Can you define the leg shading a bit? I love the stripes. How did you make them? 04:01, January 3, 2015 (UTC) Re-uploaded. I redid the shading because it bothered me. The rugged and shaky look for the stripes is supposed to be like two of my other silver tabbies, so I don't really want to smooth them out. I smudged them a bit more, but I'm not going to blur them or anything. Eh, not to sound rude, but it looks like there's a square on his front because of the shading. He also looks a tad flat. ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 05:01, January 4, 2015 (UTC) I don't get what you mean???? Explain please? Eh ignore the square thingy. I still think he looks a little flat. ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 06:10, January 4, 2015 (UTC) Did you add any facial shading? If you did, could you define it just a bit? If not though, ignore this :) 07:55, January 4, 2015 (UTC) Re-uploaded. I defined the facial shading (or the head w/e), but I fail to see where he looks flat. Mind pointing it out, since I can't see it? I'm going to take a guess and say that this is the square he is talking about. I outlined it. I don't know- that's the only square that I noticed. EDIT: I just use "he" to be used in general to someone whose gender I don't know. ♠Pinely ~Anything Is Possible 16:27, January 4, 2015 (UTC) Please please respect the fact that I'm a girl -_- Also, it's mainly flat on the body, yes, the square was what Pinely is talking about, but I think it's fine now. ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 00:47, January 5, 2015 (UTC) Re-uploaded. Not gonna define the shading much more- overly defined shading on these looks disgusting. Or at least my shading looks disgusting. I'm really sorry, it does kind of seem like he has a square on his flank now. Maybe thicken the shading instead of defining it? ~ Burntclaw Yolo ♫ ♪ 00:33, January 7, 2015 (UTC) I'd rather not thicken the shading, honestly. and I still can't see the square- the shading's actually pretty smooth there without the stripe layer- are you sure you're not confusing the stripes and my shading? Nah, it's fine, there is really no "square" ^^ I think my sis just knda got tired and can't see properly so she dozed off. ~ Foxy Don't eat my food 13:07, January 8, 2015 (UTC) CBA? 00:59, January 12, 2015 (UTC) Approved.