This HTML5 document contains 17 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n20http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JWNc72aRGxM5cJdro2WSVQ==
n17http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1yQJPtkYvcsCFgG3PlJ8mQ==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lFNTeAf4IOLhr70j31yNDA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/7K2UcMUcRO_OWzM0fLHDlg==
n18http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/K0VLLUMhMR2HmZaR7Uebjw==
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/wackypedia/property/
n16http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1e8vUfbfQVolpeXKDc0VPw==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lJnfnV9XLIqHcUJLb1SA8g==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/UBv0vQ6oCWmNc_QaljP-tA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/FHLViwvDPRJbbe1Dm0Wp9w==
n15http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/szXVmolzhcFc7GBeBwP5MQ==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/og3YnnEiESINGa2XjbB-Eg==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/wks4xCgAG--SvOr0JvvUig==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/D23vawq7Nksqn0ii_5oojQ==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/O8_1StuNCgbx_fqZUqqHsA==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/e7j6aGsK6_egQsbJPkftOQ==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Wackypedia:Review/Nazi
rdfs:comment
binclin 08:29, 2 Yoon 2008 (UTC) Well, It was my first article and I wanted to do domething completely randumb. Thanks for your thoughts on it, I do agree it needs more spunk but im too lazy. Any tips on how to improve on this and in my future articles? 17:57, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC) You could always make them a little more coherent, and think before you write. -- 18:05, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC) I always thought it was dont think at all and just write whatever, Dont know where i got that idea from. 21:09, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
n4:
n17:
my score for this article
n6:
Not great images tbh. There's so much oppurtunity here!
n10:
Nazis.... A mehpic concept. A good title & subject matter, but would need to deliver the goods without going to ranty for it to become good.
n14:
6
n9:
4.5
n5:
5
n15:
Grammar was shcoking, some what intentionally I'm guessing. Format wasn't great either.
n12:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n13:
n11:
{{:User:testostereich/sig
n16:
I hate to criticise, but that's what reviews are for.
n7:
...didn't deliver the goods. I'm starting to wonder if Binclin has an unhealthy obcession with Nazis, but nonetheless, take a more coherent, perhaps witty stance to improve this article.
n20:
4.5
n18:
6
n8:abstract
binclin 08:29, 2 Yoon 2008 (UTC) Well, It was my first article and I wanted to do domething completely randumb. Thanks for your thoughts on it, I do agree it needs more spunk but im too lazy. Any tips on how to improve on this and in my future articles? 17:57, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC) You could always make them a little more coherent, and think before you write. -- 18:05, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC) I always thought it was dont think at all and just write whatever, Dont know where i got that idea from. 21:09, 24 Yoon 2008 (UTC)