This HTML5 document contains 7 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/YsmzQKHsdq1a_LL58fPiTA==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/moshimonsters/property/
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/1KKTxX5g58lflgzXbt4qHQ==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/LKACAC6AmYgByfMUm3J9Eg==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DAsemzB8NpqUWTqAsM5Esw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/FrZ194BpkztjLMrilT1j8Q==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Moshi Monsters Wiki:Request for Rollback/Luke the Mac Lover
rdfs:comment
I think Luke should be a rollback because of these reasons below. * He has over 1,000 edits. * He is active everyday. * If he had Rollback he would Rollback edits straight away. * Luke wouldn't abuse the rights. * We need more Rollbacks on the Wiki So please vote, I personally would support! :) Good Luck Luke! :)
dcterms:subject
n9:
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n6: n7:
n10:abstract
I think Luke should be a rollback because of these reasons below. * He has over 1,000 edits. * He is active everyday. * If he had Rollback he would Rollback edits straight away. * Luke wouldn't abuse the rights. * We need more Rollbacks on the Wiki So please vote, I personally would support! :) Good Luck Luke! :)