This HTML5 document contains 8 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kP8KClggoB1Mmap_DuqCbQ==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Qb3W_PC9ZM3vnGoPQiXorQ==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/DBG7xfjJIhlQIWdy3JfkJg==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/RRZNmZc6DLecMqfJqP9Aig==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/memory-alpha/property/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/aTAk5EIyZIYKGn9o_V7kzg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/7_uFwnm_bJdehvqIJ6-Dtw==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Memory Alpha:Be bold in updating pages
rdfs:comment
If someone writes what would be considered an "inferior" article, that's fine! It's always better to have some content (as long as it's on-topic and not patent nonsense) rather than no content at all. Even with an inferior article, it's possible to start rewriting it, to develop it further into something that eventually could become the perfect article.
dcterms:subject
n4:
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6: n7: n8: n11:
n9:abstract
If someone writes what would be considered an "inferior" article, that's fine! It's always better to have some content (as long as it's on-topic and not patent nonsense) rather than no content at all. Even with an inferior article, it's possible to start rewriting it, to develop it further into something that eventually could become the perfect article. One more important rule: no one "owns" any of the articles here. There's no specific author who can claim that they wrote all of the articles, so it's perfectly all right to dive right in and add your own ideas to make the article better – as long as you follow the rules, of course!