This HTML5 document contains 11 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/t1ZCXbg9Ch1rcx0ImpGQxw==
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/NHPbVcemmVuJkUO2v-xLmA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JvI_W-yiqMfx6WCcCYun6g==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/HHgriJ_an4E6n3bjpSo3mg==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/leagueoflegends/property/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Na3Wlf507Ite6T9a7WVA_g==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/league-of-legends/property/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/vzbjIRpqptST8w4m7d9sig==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/I-zi9wH5B1175qxnCpPLcA==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/lS6--N6JmJ8P8eS2ceicKA==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/HoQ0lbe7fYQiu8AeiSDFMA==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
League of Legends Wiki talk:Vandalism Reports
rdfs:comment
Oh god the bright green is making my eyes bleed. In all seriousness it is a little difficult to read the text in the actual vandal report. perhaps a darker colour. 19:20, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * Agreed. Vyrolan 21:44, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * Text, or links? Because the text is black, and I could make the links darker as well. It isn't light green, either... :P 22:20, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * I have to agree here. Check pic. The light green background looks a bit out of place, but mostly links are unreadable. -- 23:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * I don't know if you guys like it however I went through and redid the color scheme of the IP-warned, IP-blocked, and IP-vandal pages to much... softer colors, they aren't permanent but I think they look a lot less harsh to the eyes. NeonSpotli
n6:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n7: n8: n9: n11:
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n10: n12: n13:
n14:abstract
Oh god the bright green is making my eyes bleed. In all seriousness it is a little difficult to read the text in the actual vandal report. perhaps a darker colour. 19:20, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * Agreed. Vyrolan 21:44, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * Text, or links? Because the text is black, and I could make the links darker as well. It isn't light green, either... :P 22:20, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * I have to agree here. Check pic. The light green background looks a bit out of place, but mostly links are unreadable. -- 23:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC) * I don't know if you guys like it however I went through and redid the color scheme of the IP-warned, IP-blocked, and IP-vandal pages to much... softer colors, they aren't permanent but I think they look a lot less harsh to the eyes. NeonSpotlight 20:27, April 19, 2011 (UTC) {{IP-vandal}} - Red outline indicating problem - Yellow indicating a warning - Green indicating it was resolved. - White to represent purity The colours are nicer but the links are still a little tough to read. You have black normal text and then light blue links. You need to use dark on light or light on dark but not mix them. The pink is not too bad, if you made it a bit darker i think you would be able to read everything. -- 21:25, April 19, 2011 (UTC) I think it would be much better to keep the dark normal background but use different colored borders. You could do a 2-3 pixel border in the colors you're proposing and it would work great. The border would very clearly show the status but not be so overpowering on the page. Vyrolan 21:33, April 19, 2011 (UTC) Ok, redid it, I kind of like it like this. NeonSpotlight 00:10, April 20, 2011 (UTC) Much better than what I had, thanks :D 00:44, April 20, 2011 (UTC) I'm not sure about the white one... what is purity supposed to mean? 00:52, April 20, 2011 (UTC) That template is IP-good or that it was a false report, purity meaning that the supposed vandal was not really a vandal. NeonSpotlight 00:56, April 20, 2011 (UTC) Looks great. -- 02:00, April 20, 2011 (UTC)