This HTML5 document contains 11 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/sims/property/
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/J1fTB8oqz7WXm2wYE9yfPw==
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/n2-rbWv0NlCNniqnmTSjmw==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/y5EzVA72nwysimVNIjNuDQ==
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/kC-txd0_oUdgFaKQMd5QHQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/I5NJ7DOG42hPyIVsRQQCEw==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/IqfssJrW_an5Lq_fkBAU4Q==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/ZtPiJX1t6sziFzwrvqRveg==
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/KQ3UMn2sn92SY81ojvNrMw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/nHDSwXTjoq2h49I2WXVuMw==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
The Sims Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 1
rdfs:comment
This forum thread has been sitting open for several months, and has gone two months without any new additions to it. Due to a conflict of interest I cannot call consensus for this one way or the other, so I would like another administrator or 'crat (preferably neutral) to determine whether a consensus has been reached and to state the outcome of the thread or, if consensus is not reached, to determine a proper course of action. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 07:27, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n5: n6: n7: n9: n10: n11: n13:
n12:abstract
This forum thread has been sitting open for several months, and has gone two months without any new additions to it. Due to a conflict of interest I cannot call consensus for this one way or the other, so I would like another administrator or 'crat (preferably neutral) to determine whether a consensus has been reached and to state the outcome of the thread or, if consensus is not reached, to determine a proper course of action. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 07:27, June 21, 2014 (UTC) File:Red x cross uncheck bad.svg Issue is no longer relevant Thread has been moved to a vote, so interpretation of consensus is no longer required. LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 17:54, June 30, 2014 (UTC)