This HTML5 document contains 6 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/0xdT1qkndf9sYwdxWEQ_Jw==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/iLwmCgjW111pYOOdexKPuQ==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/freespeech/property/
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/KSkWcHT8ocEB84G3MNRNTg==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JCe0PmEJ4WGRQd_syo6Btg==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Bad tendency (legal)
rdfs:comment
Bad Tendency a legal term, refers to the restriction of Freedom of Speech by the government if it is believed that it had a sole tendency to incite or cause illegal activity. The "Bad Tendency" principle, formulated in Patterson v. Colorado, (1907) was overturned with the "Clear and present danger" principle used in the landmark case Schenck v. United States, as stated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr(1919).
dcterms:subject
n7:
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n9:
n8:abstract
Bad Tendency a legal term, refers to the restriction of Freedom of Speech by the government if it is believed that it had a sole tendency to incite or cause illegal activity. The "Bad Tendency" principle, formulated in Patterson v. Colorado, (1907) was overturned with the "Clear and present danger" principle used in the landmark case Schenck v. United States, as stated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr(1919).