This HTML5 document contains 5 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n2:

rdfs:label

MicroWiki:Archives/New Admins

rdfs:comment

It's been a week and it's great that so many of you voted. The final votes are: * Ptrcancer -- 8 * Ramtak -- 7 * Joefoxon -- 5 * EdanianMinister and Scientopia - 4 each Based on the vote, we have given Ptrcancer & Ramtak bureaucrat+sysop rights, and Joefoxon sysop rights as well. (The only real difference is that b'crats can make other users sysops/b'crats as well; sysops can't). So if you feel that all 3 should be at that level you can fix it.

dcterms:subject

n5: n6:

n3:abstract

It's been a week and it's great that so many of you voted. The final votes are: * Ptrcancer -- 8 * Ramtak -- 7 * Joefoxon -- 5 * EdanianMinister and Scientopia - 4 each Based on the vote, we have given Ptrcancer & Ramtak bureaucrat+sysop rights, and Joefoxon sysop rights as well. (The only real difference is that b'crats can make other users sysops/b'crats as well; sysops can't). So if you feel that all 3 should be at that level you can fix it. I believe you guys wanted 4 admins -- how do you want to handle this? It seems, based on the vote, unfair to choose either EdanianMinister or Scientopia for the 4th so I have left it up to you to decide and make any further changes. Would you like both EdanianMinister & Scientopia to have admin rights (making 5 admins total)? Or just leave it with 3? -- Wendy (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)