This HTML5 document contains 10 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n12http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/dRXRWyaNIpZ71hmmHTdzTw==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/uncyclopedia/property/
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/iSUAQqqTcVsy40_Iz87B7A==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/NPqTjAVhwQm2szGZIsmPpA==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/C8np36kMpOroXMxAxvk4pw==
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/iVZuM_S0ajBlUli0KwmzuA==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/w7vB2N3Q4-mMVr87umkyrw==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/FvcgHZYYxHcw6-k3t5qLdQ==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/0CqTv6qQl9AP1dtZmCVdag==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Uncyclopedia:Beginner's Guide/Acceptable admins
rdfs:comment
On some humor wikis, a newbie is instantly accepted if he or she makes an edit that: 1. * Was full of random ideas and possibly the editor's own opinion, 'cos that's funny, innit? 2. * Had tons of exclamation points to show how funny you think it was!!! 3. * Used the names of Oscar Wilde, Adolf Hitler, and several Captains in a single sentence 4. * Included a link to some other website that shows the article's subject at his very worst 5. * Was downright unreadable because it imitated the subject's speech impediment or dialect 6. * Was masterful at telling the exact same joke some other guy told on the line just before. 7. * Rants about the article's subject.
dcterms:subject
n6: n12:
n3:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n4: n7: n8: n9: n10:
n13:abstract
On some humor wikis, a newbie is instantly accepted if he or she makes an edit that: 1. * Was full of random ideas and possibly the editor's own opinion, 'cos that's funny, innit? 2. * Had tons of exclamation points to show how funny you think it was!!! 3. * Used the names of Oscar Wilde, Adolf Hitler, and several Captains in a single sentence 4. * Included a link to some other website that shows the article's subject at his very worst 5. * Was downright unreadable because it imitated the subject's speech impediment or dialect 6. * Was masterful at telling the exact same joke some other guy told on the line just before. 7. * Rants about the article's subject. Unfortunately, on this website, any of the above could get your edit undone. As detailed in How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid, it is not enough here to tell the truth, tell lies, imitate, ramble, babble, and point the reader to THE FACTS. None of that is funny unless you do actual work to make it funny in a clever new way. "Funny" here doesn't mean funny to you the editor/vandal, but potentially funny to some of our potential readers.