This HTML5 document contains 7 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/5UwxjpwCbPvd0n0bqCvflw==
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/fAb3Bnzgb7ho8_SHfoRsIw==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Ng1r3tmvrQHWbYtisR9QfA==
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/qeURMafKUL5jKeU2m62ILw==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/scratch-pad/property/
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/vEXQY66phJrhymp-b7TY5g==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/scratchpad/property/
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
CC.UK.ManchesterGathering.Agenda
rdfs:comment
~ Process and Manchester Groups in Agenda for Manchester on climatecamp [at] lists.riseup.net (login required for access) Many thanks to the Process and Manchester Groups for the work they've put in so far in assimilating and consolidating the many proposals into a coherent Agenda. Unfortunately, in the course of making a more usable hotlinked version of our Agenda, cross-referencing the Agenda Items In Full document, I've found several inconsistencies between ~ dalinian 11:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC) __TOC__
dcterms:subject
n4: n8:
n5:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n6:
n9:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n10:
n7:abstract
~ Process and Manchester Groups in Agenda for Manchester on climatecamp [at] lists.riseup.net (login required for access) Many thanks to the Process and Manchester Groups for the work they've put in so far in assimilating and consolidating the many proposals into a coherent Agenda. Unfortunately, in the course of making a more usable hotlinked version of our Agenda, cross-referencing the Agenda Items In Full document, I've found several inconsistencies between * the Summary of Gathering Agenda; * the Summary of Proposals; and * the Agenda Items In Full document (including four missing Proposals-In-Full) Although I'm not (yet) part of the national Process Working Group, I'll do what I can to improve this situation and get these gaps filled in as soon as possible. ~ dalinian 11:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC) __TOC__