This HTML5 document contains 12 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n9http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/ontology/
n6http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/JPoufjs2a9H9CiUd3W6MKA==
n7http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/S8s3gVp6AHRpBAAUFb9IXg==
n2http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/Ov_cDHBqzUJQjUJy5haEwA==
n3http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/T0pV1D9Let2IgnXf6GgkgQ==
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/jpeN1_vv7GlUSZZFCwOIEw==
n5http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/EjTOLa8vY9dSABBBLGkamw==
n13http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/eyla0TW4WlMQCEoIiE1BGg==
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/BvH6iuG5LEPsxdxQfgylkQ==
n4http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/warriors/property/
n11http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/4Y6cniajg2LUtqG-P-oy1w==
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n8http://dbkwik.webdatacommons.org/resource/R1VLs9zV_GH0iUF9nVSDBQ==
Subject Item
n2:
rdfs:label
Warriors Wiki talk:Charart
rdfs:comment
Apparently someone changed her description from a silver cat to a light gray one (I guess it's because she was described as gray more than silver). And from my knowledge, silver =/= gray. Should we change the silver images into alts, according to this? (Sorry about my wording) I...? Don't quite follow? Which images are technically the silver ones, and which ones are the gray ones? I'm so confused and can't tell just from a glance. is she light grey or silver? 02:54, July 27, 2017 (UTC) Anymore comments?
n4:wikiPageUsesTemplate
n5: n7: n8: n10: n13:
n3:
left
n14:
Declined
n6:
Discussion
n11:
100.0
n9:abstract
Apparently someone changed her description from a silver cat to a light gray one (I guess it's because she was described as gray more than silver). And from my knowledge, silver =/= gray. Should we change the silver images into alts, according to this? (Sorry about my wording) I...? Don't quite follow? Which images are technically the silver ones, and which ones are the gray ones? I'm so confused and can't tell just from a glance. File:Millie.warrior.alt.png File:Millie.queen.alt.png File:Millie.loner.alt2.png are the current light gray alts. Her main images are the silver tabby ones with the dark stripes. Since now she's light gray (idk who changed it but I can see why) I was wondering if her silver images become alts while the gray ones become the main images (Sorry, I tried to explain. This is what happens after I get roasted in the sun for a while) is she light grey or silver? 02:54, July 27, 2017 (UTC) She's light gray. Check trivia for reason. I switched the description, because of, again, what is in trivia. I asked someone, forgot who, about switching the images around to match the description but they said it was fine. I'm not pointing fingers or anything, I'm just stating why this wasn't brought up at the time.Stealthf🔥re ❤Warriors Forever!❤ 07:02, July 27, 2017 (UTC) Well the thing is, silver is not gray, they are different shades. We have had gray alts for silver cats + vice versa and I don't see why this should be an exception. Gray tabbies do not have black stripes. That maaaaay have been me, my apologies. I actually thought stripe darkness was artist's choice, hence why I never brought anything up. If I'm wrong, however, then we should technically make images to match her current description. Anymore comments?